Documentary Growing 1981 Larry Rivers __link__ Download Jun 2026

A trained psychologist, Emma went to the archive and, after viewing her childhood self on the monitors, secretly stole a copy of the film. She then presented this footage to Emily Logue, an Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan, who reportedly deemed the movie obscene under the law. Emma's mission has been a desperate attempt to have the film legally destroyed, using her own trauma as evidence. However, the archival material remains with the university, the Foundation that controls Rivers’ legacy, and critics who argue that destruction of art is a form of heresy against the artist's intent.

By 1981, Rivers was not just an artist but a celebrity. The art market was booming, and the public was hungry for the "dirt" behind the canvases. It was the perfect moment for a documentary that promised to "grow" before your eyes. Documentary Growing 1981 Larry Rivers Download

The film was never shown to the public. When Rivers initially completed the cut in 1981, the girls' mother, Clarice Rivers, stepped in and stopped the exhibition. The tapes were locked away in Rivers' private collection until after his death in 2002. A trained psychologist, Emma went to the archive

[Larry Rivers Foundation] ──(Attempts Archive Sale)──> [New York University] │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┴──────────┐ ▼ ▼ [Emma Rivers Tamburlini] ──(Demands Return / Cites Exploitation) [NYU Rejects Tapes] However, the archival material remains with the university,

Perhaps Growing was a student film, a single 16mm reel shown once at the Collective for Living Cinema on White Street, then lost. Perhaps Rivers himself suppressed it—he was vain but also fiercely honest, and seeing himself on film may have revealed too much. Or perhaps the title is a misremembered fragment: a composite of Rivers’s actual film The Central Park Sheiks (1983) and a lost documentary called Larry Rivers: A Late Style that aired once on WNET.

While the art world has historically featured nudity, critics note that Growing weaponized a parental power dynamic to violate the consent of minors, crossing the line from artistic expression into severe exploitation.

Distributing or downloading footage of minors under these conditions violates federal and international child protection laws.